Resource World Magazine

Resource World - October-November 2018 - Vol 16 Issue 6

Issue link: http://resourceworld.uberflip.com/i/1037672

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 66 of 71

O C T O B E R / N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 8 www.resourceworld.com 67 acquisition process as subsurface condi- tions required a relocation. With the first permitting and project planning complete, DEEP is starting the drilling and testing phase of the Bankable Feasibility Study. The successful addition of renewable baseload power will directly benefit all residents of Saskatchewan and assist SaskPower in achieving its goal of 50% renewable power generation by the year 2030. In a related development, Kirsten Marcia has been appointed a Director at Large of the newly-formed Geothermal Canada organization. In 2017, a group of like-minded individuals felt the time was ripe to resurrect the original, scientifically oriented society with a new name and renewed vigour. As geothermal energy gains prominence in Canada, professionals, students, governments and other interested people needed a venue to discuss techni - cal and academic aspects of the industry. On February 1, 2018, CGA was reborn as the Pan Canadian Society for Geothermal Research, Innovation, and Collaboration, colloquially known as Geothermal Canada (www.geothermalcanada.org). A LOOK AT SOLAR PANEL BENEFITS AND CONCERNS Go Solar Group, headquartered in Utah, is a family-owned, full-service solar com- pany. The company began as a non-profit organization dedicated to delivering solar- based clean energy to Ugandan villages and has since relied on residential solar installations in Utah and Reno, Nevada to help micro-finance solar solutions abroad. In his papers, The Environment Runs on Solar Power. Here's How We Can Too, and Using Solar Power to go Green, Scott Cramer, Go Solar's President, states that as nonre- newable resources become more scarce, basic economic principles mean costs will skyrocket. Solar energy will not increase in price, nor will the technology to lever- age it. One of the key benefits of opting for solar power, he says, is cost savings for homeowners, businesses, and lower income areas. And, solar power provides a fixed rate for utility bills, so owners can predict their everyday use. He notes that "community gardens," which, in this case, are community solar projects, provide a viable solar power option for lower income areas and a sustainable model for chari - table solar projects. He says that while few private entities have embraced this deliv- ery model, US government dollars do fund some solar power projects. Cramer says as more people join the solar revolution, communities will ben- efit. For most, the price is the main reason they don't choose solar power. However, community solar allows more individuals the ability to afford renewable energy. Cramer points out in his paper that haz - ardous waste concerns make the recycling of solar panels necessary. If solar arrays aren't recycled they end up in landfills, and toxins in the panels could leach out. For example, a byproduct, silicon tetra- chloride, harms the environment. It is important to manage these materials both at the beginning and at the end of each solar panel life cycle. An average solar power system lasts 25 plus years, but at the end of that life cycle, panels inevitably need proper disposal. The boom for solar installations began in 2010 for the US. This means that most Americans won't recycle panels until about 2035. Most solar panels aren't losing their efficiency yet, but they can sustain dam - age. Damaged panels need proper recycling now, not in 17 years. Processes that treat the toxic wastes are expensive, and most manufacturers in the US aren't required to follow them. Recycling in Europe is a requirement. The US, on the other hand, has an unregulated market. This means that recycling must be cost-effective. Less than 11% of each panel has salvageable metals, so recycling isn't cost effective. This has made PV recycling a challenge in the US. Cramer points out that supporting manufacturers that take these expensive precautionary measures will help reduce toxins. With no eco-label to help cus - tomers, Cramer notes the PV Module Reliability Scorecard, which is available online, contains a volunteer-based data- base. It provides a solar scorecard and rates major manufacturers that have vol- unteered information. The scorecard is available each year, and the same compa- nies do not always participate. The average 2016-2017 score was 36. Choosing a man- ufacturer with a high-to-average score will help make a change in the level of impact on the environment. The Go Solar Group uses New Jersey-based Axitec, LLC German-engineered panels for their Utah and Nevada installations. When Axitec last participated in the database project, they received a score of 55. Although nationally mandated programs don't exist, states are trying to require solar panel recycling. In 2021, Washington will start requiring manufacturers to have end- of-life recycling programs. To that end, Recycle PV, provides solar panel recycling services to the nation and pays to recycle panels without broken glass. Broken glass panels are recycled for a fee. With an eye toward a national recy - cling program, the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) also has a national recycling program. They have partnered with several recycling companies and will partner with others. The recycling price depends on the type of solar panels involved and how many. Most of these recycling programs are between the recy - cler and the solar panels manufacturer. If the solar panel manufacturer doesn't recy- cle, owners can call the recycling company directly. As recycling increases, the price will decrease. n GREEN TECHNOLOGIES

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Resource World Magazine - Resource World - October-November 2018 - Vol 16 Issue 6